Milton Friedman on The free society
Freedom is a tenable objective only for responsible individuals. We do not believe in freedom for madmen or children. The necessity of drawing a line between responsible individuals and others is inescapable, yet it means that there is an essential ambiguity in our ultimate objective of freedom. Paternalism is inescapable for those whom we designate as not responsible.
Capitalism and Freedom
Book, 1962, Ch. 2 The Role of Government in a Free Society, p. 33
Not yet checkedCite this passage
Where this comes from
Not yet checkedThe wording comes from a secondary compilation and has not yet been checked against the work itself.
Topics
He also said
As liberals, we take freedom of the individual, or perhaps the family, as our ultimate goal in judging social arrangements. Freedom as a value in this sense has to do with the interrelations among people
Capitalism and FreedomBook, 1962, Ch. 1 The Relation Between Economic Freedom and Political Freedom, p. 12Not yet checkedNone of this means that government does not have a very real function. Indeed, the tragedy is that because government is doing so many things it ought not to be doing, it performs the functions it ought to be performing badly. The basic functions of government are to defend the nation against foreign enemies, to prevent coercion of some individuals by others within the country, to provide a means of deciding on our rules, and to adjudicate disputes.
Why Government Is the ProblemJournal article, 1993, Hoover Institution Press, Essays in Public Policy no. 39, p. 6Checked against the sourceRead the originalA liberal is fundamentally fearful of concentrated power. His objective is to preserve the maximum degree of freedom for each individual separately that is compatible with one man's freedom not interfering with other men's freedom. He believes that this objective requires that power be dispersed. He is suspicious of assigning to government any functions that can be performed through the market, both because this substitutes coercion for voluntary co-operation in the area in question and because, by giving government an increased role, it threatens freedom in other areas.
Capitalism and FreedomBook, 1962, Ch. 3 The Control of Money, p. 39Not yet checked
Think this quote is wrong, misattributed, or missing context?Report it and it gets fixed, not argued with.