Milton Friedman on The Great Depression
The great contraction is tragic testimony to the power of monetary policy—not, as Keynes and so many of his contemporaries believed, evidence of its impotence.
The Role of Monetary Policy
Journal article, 1968, American Economic Review 58, no. 1 (March 1968), pp. 1–17; reprinted in the House Banking and Currency Committee’s 1968 Compendium on Monetary Policy Guidelines and Federal Reserve Structure, pp. 214–224, p. 216 of the 1968 House reprint
Where this comes from
Checked against the sourceThe wording was checked against the work itself.
Topics
He also said
On a technical level, I believe that there is no persuasive evidence that, given the course of monetary policy and monetary aggregates, federal government deficits have any stimulative effect. They have a stimulative effect only insofar as they are financed by a more rapid increase in the quantity of money than would otherwise occur.
Interview with Milton FriedmanInterview, 1992, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, The Region, Interview by David Levy, June 1, 1992Checked against the sourceRead the transcriptThe only way you could get the inflation down was by having monetary contraction. There was no way you could do that without having a temporary recession. The great error in the earlier period had been that whenever there was a little contraction there was a tendency to expand the money supply rapidly in order to avoid unemployment. That stop-and-go policy was really what bedeviled the Fed during the '60s and '70s.
Commanding Heights: Milton Friedman interviewInterview, 2000, PBS, “On Ronald Reagan,” interview conducted October 1, 2000Checked against the sourceRead the transcriptThe contraction from 1929 to 1933 was by far the most severe business-cycle contraction during the near-century of U.S. history we cover and it may well have been the most severe in the whole of U.S. history.
A Monetary History of the United StatesBook, 1963, "The Great Contraction, 1929-1933" (1963), with Anna J. SchwartzNot yet checked
Think this quote is wrong, misattributed, or missing context?Report it and it gets fixed, not argued with.