Milton Friedman on Schools and vouchers
The problem is how to get from here to there. Vouchers are not an end in themselves; they are a means to make a transition from a government to a market system.
Context. From a February 1995 Washington Post article arguing that American elementary and secondary schooling must be radically reconstructed by privatizing much of it, through a universal voucher that lets parents choose their children’s schools, a plan he first proposed in 1955. “Here” is the present system, in which about 90 percent of children attend government schools; “there” is a large, competitive private industry offering a wide variety of schooling.
Where this comes from
Checked against the sourceThe wording was checked against the work itself.
Cite this passage
Milton Friedman, “Public Schools: Make Them Private” (The Washington Post, February 19, 1995; reprinted in full in the Congressional Record, Extensions of Remarks, March 28, 1995, pp. 9551 to 9552 (E703 to E704 in the daily edition), inserted by Representative Philip M. Crane., 1995), Congressional Record, March 28, 1995, p. 9552. https://miltonfriedman.org/quotes/vouchers-not-end-in-themselves-transition-1995
Quoted for commentary and research. Rights in the underlying work remain with its rights holder, so cite the work itself, not only this page.
Topics
He also said
I believe that the only way to make a major improvement in our educational system is through privatization to the point at which a substantial fraction of all educational services are rendered to individuals by private enterprises. Nothing else will destroy or even greatly weaken the power of the current educational establishment—a necessary precondition for radical improvement in our educational system. And nothing else will provide the public schools with the competition that will force them to improve in order to hold their clientele.
Context. From a February 1995 Washington Post article arguing that American elementary and secondary schooling must be radically reconstructed by privatizing much of it, through a universal voucher that lets parents choose their children’s schools, a plan he first proposed in 1955. Earlier in the article he names the school establishment, reinforced by the two national teachers’ unions, as the main obstacle to vouchers.
Public Schools: Make Them PrivateColumn, 1995, The Washington Post, February 19, 1995; reprinted in full in the Congressional Record, Extensions of Remarks, March 28, 1995, pp. 9551 to 9552 (E703 to E704 in the daily edition), inserted by Representative Philip M. Crane., Congressional Record, March 28, 1995, p. 9552The good news is that, despite these setbacks, public interest in and support for vouchers and tax credits continue to grow. Legislative proposals to channel government funds directly to students rather than to schools are under consideration in something like 20 states. Sooner or later there will be a breakthrough; we shall get a universal voucher plan in one or more states. When we do, a competitive private educational market serving parents who are free to choose the school they believe best for each child will demonstrate how that market can revolutionize schooling.
Context. From an essay written fifty years after his 1955 article “The Role of Government in Education,” in which he first proposed school vouchers. Just before, he describes two statewide voucher initiatives in California, in 1993 and 2000, both of which led in the polls nine months before the vote and were defeated after a well-financed campaign against them.
Free to ChooseColumn, 2005, The Wall Street Journal, June 9, 2005; reprinted in Hoover Digest 2005 No. 3 under the title “Free to Choose”Checked against the sourceRead the sourceThe key difference, and it is crucial, is that parents—and not government bureaucrats—would decide what schools their children attend. In the process, they would also decide which schools got more funds and which less, and parents who chose private schools would be relieved, at least in part, from having to pay twice for schooling their children—once through taxes, once through school fees. The result would be to give teachers and administrators a strong incentive to meet the wants of their real customers—the students. “The customer is the boss” is the characteristic slogan of a competitive market. Vouchers would make that slogan apply to schooling.
Context. From the book’s chapter on education. Just before, the Friedmans describe versions of a school voucher plan and say that none of them changes where the money for schooling comes from: all citizens, with children or without, would still pay taxes to finance it. “The key difference” is the difference from the present system.
Tyranny of the Status QuoBook, 1984, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Ch. 8 “Education”, p. 156 (with Rose D. Friedman)Checked against the sourceFind the book
Think this quote is wrong, misattributed, or missing context? Report it and it gets fixed, not argued with.